Legal Opinion

Fleckten v. Lamberton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 1897No. Nos. 10,593—(196)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Williston, J., sustaining the demurrer of defendants to the complaint on the grounds that it does not state a cause of action, and that plaintiffs have not legal capacity to sue.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs, taxpayers and residents of this state, against the state board of capital commissioners, and the members thereof, to enjoin them from erecting the new capitol provided for by chapter 2, Laws 1898, on the ground that said board is misappropriating public funds in erecting the same, contrary to the provisions of the constitution. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiffs appeal.

*189Said chapter 2 provides for the appointment of a board, which shall select a site in St. Paul for the erection of a new capitol building, purchase the…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State Ex Rel. Richards v. MoorerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Craig v. O'RearCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API