Billingsley v. Zickert
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The issues presented are as follows:
1. Did the trial court commit error in ruling that as a matter of law the area surrounding the accident scene was a “business district” ?
2. Did the trial court err in instructing the jury on the duty of an automobile operator to remain awake?
3. Did the trial court err in instructing the jury on the effects of intoxicating beverages ?
4. Should a new trial be granted ?
5. In recovering costs are the disbursements of a party for photographs and plats taxable to a limit of $50 per category ?
Business district.
The appellant contends that the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Savina v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Theisen v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Royal Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Osborne-McMillan Elevator Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pulsfus Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Town of LeedsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Pappas v. Jack O. A. Nelsen Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. SeibelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Buel v. La Crosse Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. SeibelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991