Legal Opinion

Pulsfus Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Town of Leeds

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1989No. 87-1033PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is a review of a decision by the court of appeals, Pulsfus Farms v. Town of Leeds, 144 Wis. 2d 729, 424 N.W.2d 737 (Ct. App. 1988), which affirmed a judgment of the Circuit Court for Columbia County, Honorable Earl J. McMahon, Judge. The circuit court found that a layer house and its contents, owned by Pulsfus Poultry Farms, Inc., (Pulsfus), constituted farm machinery used in farming and was exempt from taxation pursuant to sec. 70.111(9), Stats. 1983-84. The Town of Leeds (Town) was ordered to reimburse Pulsfus for the taxes illegally assessed, levied and collected on the property. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. ClausenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. DeMars v. LaPourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. WachsmuthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Waushara County v. GrafWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hauboldt v. Union Carbide Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of GlendaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API