Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Osborne-McMillan Elevator Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
This appeal raises the question of what is an explosion as that term is used in the insurance policies applied to the insured’s business of storing and handling grain in Superior, Wisconsin. The word “explosion” is not defined in the policies but the exclusion clause of the endorsement provides: “Loss by explosion shall include direct loss resulting from the explosion of accumulated gases or unconsumed fuel within the firébox (or combustion chamber) of any fired vessel or within the flues or passages which conduct the gases of combustion therefrom. However, this Company shall not be liable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Allen v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Bauman v. Midland Union InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Hart-Bartlett-Sturtevant Grain Co. v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Harper v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fischer Ex Rel. Fischer v. GanjuWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Lutz v. Shelby Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Hoeft v. FriedelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Honeymead Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Frantl Industries, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.