Legal Opinion

Pappas v. Jack O. A. Nelsen Agency, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1978No. 75-699PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The following issues are raised on appeal:

1. Was the testimony of Andrew Pappas incredible as a matter of law so that the appellants’ motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict should have been granted?

2. Was respondent a third-party beneficiary of an oral contract to procure insurance?

3. Did the trial court err in awarding pre-verdict interest?

4. Should a new trial be granted in the interests of justice?

Credibility of Witness

The appellants contend that the trial court erred in denying their motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chart Ex Rel. Sommer v. General Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City of Franklin v. Badger Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Luber v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. v. Royal Electric Manufacturing Company, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Valiga v. National Food Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Virgil v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mercado Ex Rel. Laufer v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. TrudeauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Goossen v. Estate of StandaertCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. In Re Air Crash Disaster Near Chicago, Ill., Etc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API