Fifth Third Bank of Western Ohio v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
Seven years after the filing of the complaint in this Winstar case, defendant, for the first time, contends that plaintiff lacks standing, and is not the real party in interest or the proper party to bring this litigation. Plaintiff has cross-moved for partial summary judgment on these three issues. Argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
The facts relating to this motion are discussed in this court’s previous opinion on Plaintiffs “Short-Form” Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, see Fifth Third Bank of Western Ohio v.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Rochester v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Sterling Savings v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Textainer Equipment Management Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Ground Improvement Techniques, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012