Legal Opinion

Sterling Savings v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 9, 2003No. 95-829 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

The Court has found the Government liable for breach of contract, in this Winstarrelated case, in connection with Sterling Savings Association’s acquisition of three thrifts. Nevertheless, before the Court can determine the appropriate remedy for the breach, it must resolve whether Sterling has standing to assert a damages claim. Defendant argues that Sterling does not have standing due to the issuance of an injunction against the Government, which prevented it from taking any regulatory action inconsistent with the agreements it entered into with Sterling. Thus,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kawa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Aldridge v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Eagle Design & Management, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. In Re McCartneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API