Legal Opinion

Fishburne v. Merchants Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1906No. 5913PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Jefferson county, Hatch, J., entered July 8, 1905, upon the pleadings upon the motion of the defendant^ in an action to recover a deposit in a bank.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

— The plaintiff and appellant, administrator in this cause, having died pending the appeal, and it having been made to appear to this court that George P. Pishburne has been appointed to succeed the deceased administrator, *474it is. now, on stipulation of the parties, ordered that said George P. Fishburne, as such administrator, shall be, and he is hereby, substituted as party plaintiff and appellant herein.

The action was brought to recover the balance of a deposit in the defendant bank, alleged to have been due and owing to William IT. Fiske, now deceased, at the time of his death. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kelley v. KriessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Ainsworth v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Murphy v. ColtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  4. Noerdlinger v. HuffWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Ware v. HowleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dallas Dome Wyoming Oil Fields Co. v. BrooderWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McDonald v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Mendenhall v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Webb v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API