Dallas Dome Wyoming Oil Fields Co. v. Brooder
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlume, J.
(after reciting the foregoing statement of facts).
1. Defendant contends that the various extensions of the indebtedness were necessary, and were beneficial to the deceased; that it had the right to take the property back when the purchaser defaulted, without being responsible to the deceased therefor; that the agreement to pay a commission is a limited one, and it is liable only for the commission on the amount actually collected, namely, for five per cent of $153,751.08, resulting in a liability of $7,687.55 and nothing more. There can, of course, be no doubt that where parties make a…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Virginia v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Brinkerhoff-Farris Trust & Savings Co. v. Home Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Bose v. KnutzenNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Tevis v. RyanArizona Supreme Court · 1910
- McPhail v. BuellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Engle v. First National Bank of ChugwaterWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Reed v. WadsworthWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Meima v. BroemmelWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- William C. Forbes and Julia Forbes, Trustees of the Beckton Ranch Trust U/A/D April 1, 1920Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Zwick v. United Farm Agency, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.