Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Grays Harbor County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1930No. 22645. Department OnePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— The plaintiffs, casualty company and insurance company, jointly commenced this action in the superior court for Grays Harbor county, seeking’ a de cree establishing and limiting the liability of each of them upon its separate depositary bond; executed as surety, with Hayes & Hayes, Bankers, a banking corporation of this state, now insolvent, as principal, to secure payment of its deposit indebtedness to the defendant county. For the purpose of our present inquiry, we may regard the controversy as being between three parties: (1) The plaintiffs, casualty company and insurance company, whose…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Knaffl v. Knoxville Banking & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Fishburne v. Merchants BankWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Puget Sound State Bank v. Washington Paving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Mendenhall v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Paulsell v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Goodwin v. American Surety Co. of New YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Sturdivant Bank v. Stoddard CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Douglass v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. In Re Harvey Cole Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API