Legal Opinion

Heitman v. Cronstroms Manufacturing, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1987No. C2-86-1793PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Relator appeals from a determination that his falsification of an employment application constituted misconduct. We remand for a determination whether the misrepresentation was material to the position for which relator was applying.

FACTS

Rodney Heitman was involved in an automobile accident on February 3, 1985. A few days later, when Heitman’s upper back and shoulders began bothering him, he went to a doctor, who took x-rays, informed him that he had a sore back and strained ligaments, and prescribed heat and an anti-inflammatory medication. Heitman continued to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Nyberg v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Group Health Plan, Inc. v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Hendrickson v. Northfield CleanersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Icenhower v. Total Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. State v. HockensmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Independent School District No. 709 v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Nina Wilson v. Mortgage Resource Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. Larson v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API