United States v. Rentz
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MATHESON, Circuit Judge.
After Philbert Rentz fired a single gunshot that wounded one victim and killed another, he was charged with two separate counts of using a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Mr. Rentz moved to dismiss the second § 924(c) count. The district court granted his motion, holding that § 924(c) cannot support multiple § 924(c) charges arising from a single use of a firearm. The Government appeals the pre-trial dismissal of the second § 924(c) count. Exercising jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731, we reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marcus Hahn v. Bonita MoseleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. WyssCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Marcus Hahn v. Bonita MoseleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. RentzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.