Legal Opinion

United States v. Rentz

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 18, 2013No. 16-1055PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHESON, Circuit Judge.

After Philbert Rentz fired a single gunshot that wounded one victim and killed another, he was charged with two separate counts of using a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Mr. Rentz moved to dismiss the second § 924(c) count. The district court granted his motion, holding that § 924(c) cannot support multiple § 924(c) charges arising from a single use of a firearm. The Government appeals the pre-trial dismissal of the second § 924(c) count. Exercising jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731, we reverse.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marcus Hahn v. Bonita MoseleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. WyssCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. Marcus Hahn v. Bonita MoseleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. RentzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API