Marcus Hahn v. Bonita Moseley
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GREGORY, Chief Judge:
Petitioner-Appellant Marcus Hahn appeals the final order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Because Hahn's current sentence stems from faulty arithmetic based on a now-obsolete scheme of statutory interpretation, we conclude that Hahn's petition meets the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e), the savings clause. We therefore reverse the district court's order and remand with instructions to grant Hahn's writ of habeas corpus.1
I
On December 31, 1999, law enforcement from various state and federal agencies executed a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In Re James Davenport and Sherman NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rice v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Lee Farkas v. Warden, FCI Butner IICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Patrick Marlowe v. Warden, FCI HazeltonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- John Ham, Jr. v. Warden M. BreckonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- In re: Randolph McNeillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- Albritton v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.