Legal Opinion
United States v. Wyss
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 12, 2014No. 13-4005PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
The issue before us is whether 18 U.S.C. § 3563(c), which generally authorizes a district court to modify a defendant’s conditions of probation, authorized the court in this case to modify an order of restitution imposed pursuant to the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, over three years after the judgment of sentence became final. Reviewing this question of statutory interpretation de novo, United States v. Rentz, 735 F.3d 1245, 1248 (10th Cir.2013), we hold § 3563(c) did not authorize the district court to modify the order of restitution, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Dolan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. McGaughyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Angel PuentesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Timothy RitchieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Joaquin Amador Serrapio, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Edmund PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.