Legal Opinion
O'Sullivan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 19, 2000No. CIV. 99-994(SSB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Presently before this Court, pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter “ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132(e)(1), as well as 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a) (removal statute) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question jurisdiction), is the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (hereinafter “MetLife”), Plaintiff Lynne O’Sullivan’s (“O’Sullivan”) Opposition of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Alvaro Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc. And Playskool Baby, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schlegel v. Life Ins. Co. of N. AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Lasser v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Oslowski v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Berge v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Freccia Ex Rel. Estate of Ercole v. Conectiv and Coventry Health Care of Delaware, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.