Legal Opinion
Freccia Ex Rel. Estate of Ercole v. Conectiv and Coventry Health Care of Delaware, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 29, 2004No. Civ.A.03-186 GMSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SLEET, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On February 10, 2003, the above-captioned action was filed, alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. 1 In this action, Freccia seeks to recover the cost of a bone marrow transplant (“BMT”), which she claims is due under the Coventry Health Care of Delaware, Inc. (“Coventry”) Point of Service Plan (the “Plan”), a medical benefits plan sponsored by Conectiv (“Conectiv”). 2
Presently before the court is Conectiv’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the court will grant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Maria H. Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- George W. Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ford v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2006