Legal Opinion

Dobson Telephone Company v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corporation Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 16, 2019No. Case 116,422PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINCHESTER, J.,

¶1 The issue before this Court is whether the Oklahoma Corporation Commission ("the Commission") erroneously withheld funding to be provided to Dobson Telephone Company ("Dobson") pursuant to the provisions of the Oklahoma Universal Service Fund ("OUSF"), 17 O.S.Supp.2016, § 139.106. For the reasons set forth herein, we find that Dobson is entitled to the requested funding.

*149STATUTORY BACKGROUND

¶2 In 1996, the U.S. Congress passed the federal Telecommunications Act, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq ., in part, to promote a policy of universal service that would provide telecommunication…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Fanning v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Oral Roberts University v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Cameron v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA CORP. COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
  2. OKLA. GAS AND ELECTRIC CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. CORPORATION COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
  3. BEVERLY THOMPSON, Next Friend of CHARLENE HUGHES, an Individual v. HEARTWAY CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
  4. Dobson Telephone Company v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  5. MAGEL v. NUVEENCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API