Legal Opinion
Green v. Cox MacHinery Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 19, 1926No. 16224PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUTH, C.
The parties hereto will be designated as they appeared in the trial court. The Cox Machinery Company, as plaintiff, brought its action against F. 1. Green, Ralph, Renseh, O. Clark, Thomas Herbert, and N. E. Humphries, copartners, trading as the Co-operative Mining Company, .praying judgment on nine promissory notes aggregating $1,675, together with interest, costs, and attorneys’ fees, and for foreclosure of a chattel mortgage executed by defendants covering certain mining machinery sold by plaintiff to defendants. The second cause of action is for judgment in the sum of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Guthrie & Western Railroad v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Peck v. First Nat. Bank of ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dusbabek v. BowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Barnhart v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Crabb v. ChisumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Anderson, Clayton & Co., D/B/A Acco Feeds v. Farmers National Bank of CordellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Tuloma Pipe & Supply Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.