Legal Opinion
Barnhart v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 1, 1928No. 17995PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This was a suit on a promissory note and to foreclose a real estate mortgage 'given to secure the same, comí meneed by defendant in error, plaintiff below, against C. H. Barnhart and his wife, Katie Barnhart. j
The defense below was based upon allegations of forgery by artifice and fraud said to have been employed by plaintiff in secur-1 ing the signatures of defendants to the in-, struments involved. A second defense was that of usury. The mortgage sued upon was what is known as a commission or second mortgage.
The court below directed the verdict upon the conclusion of testimony, and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Covington v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Bean v. RumrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Clement Mortgage Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Bell v. Riggs Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Federal Mortg. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Tobin v. HolmboeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Sidney M. Massie, Individually, and Sidney M. Massie, as Executive Officer and Trustee of Massie Development Company v. Rose RubinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Davis v. Federal Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
- Mortgage Bond Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.