McClellan v. Larchar
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill for specific performance.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The object of this suit is to compel the defendant to specifically perform his written agreement to purchase the late residence of General George B. McClellan, at Orange, in this state. The only question between the parties is whether the complainant, under the will of her husband, has power to sell the real estate in question. She has tendered to the defendant not only her individual deed, but also her deed as executrix and trustee under the will, and her children have offered to join in any conveyance that may be necessary from them to perfect the defendant’s title.
General…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ide v. IdeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Jackson v. SebringNew York Supreme Court · 1819
- Howard v. CarusiSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Gifford v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Jackson ex dem. Brewster v. BullNew York Supreme Court · 1813
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gaston v. FordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Briggs v. FaulknerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Higgins v. MispethNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Cree v. KennedyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Trafton v. BainbridgeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938