Trafton v. Bainbridge

A motion to strike the bill of complaint was argued on the following notice:

"That under the `Third' clause of the will of Emma J. Dunkerley, deceased, her husband, William George Dunkerley, now deceased, took an estate in fee and became the absolute owner of said residuary estate, and the subsequent limitation over contained in the `Fourth' clause of said will is void as inconsistent with the right of said William George Dunkerley; and, also because a fee cannot be limited after a fee."

The third and fourth clauses of the will adverted to in the notice of motion reads as follows:

"Third: All…