Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Faulkner

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 13, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill seeks the construction of the will of S. Emma Ross, deceased. The complainant is the daughter of the testatrix and was named as residuary legatee in the fifth paragraph of the will. The question involved is whether she takes a fee or only a life estate in the residue. The only portions of the will which need be here recited are the following paragraphs: "First. All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate both real and personal, whatsoever and wheresoever, I give, bequeath and devise unto my daughter, Helen Frances Ross Briggs.

"Sixth. What remains at my daughter's decease, I…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. GreenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
  2. Gaston v. FordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. Genung v. BestNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  4. Weaver v. PattersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  5. Annin's executors v. Vandoren's administratorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1861

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. N.J. Title Guarantee, C., Co. v. DaileyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  2. Laval v. OsterhoutNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Klotz v. KlotzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  4. Morgan v. MurtonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  5. Cranford Trust Co. v. RobusNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API