Legal Opinion

Ajax Holding Co. v. Heinsbergen

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1944No. Civ. 14409PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The question for decision is whether the summary judgment of dismissal is correct where the only writing signed by defendants for the sale of a number of city lots and the apartment hotel on a number of them was escrow instructions prepared by plaintiff in which, before signing, defendants inserted a supplement or counterproposal requiring their own approval of letters relative to the transaction to be written by plaintiff, which supplement was never accepted by plaintiff.

Summary judgment herein denied plaintiff damages allegedly suffered by reason of defendants’ refusal to convey real and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Alexander v. BosworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Laird v. McPheeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Cooper v. StansburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Kahn v. LischnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. American Aeronautics Corp. v. Grand Central Aircraft Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Apablasa v. Merritt & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Krasley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API