Legal Opinion

Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1943No. Civ. 14103PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff and defendant executed an instrument in writing which they denominated a lease of real property. With one exception it is definite and certain as to terms, description of premises, quiet enjoyment, remedies upon default, rental, and all other usual and necessary parts of a lease.

The controversy here involved revolves around the agreement of the plaintiff to erect a building upon the demised premises to be rented in part by the. defendant. Therefore, that part of the lease is as follows :

“Lessor covenants and agrees that, upon the execution of this lease, it will…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Pacific Improvement Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Howard v. BurrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Toms v. HellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Los Angeles Soda Works v. Southern California Aquazone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. American Mining Co. v. Himrod-Kimball Mines Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  4. Gavina v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API