Legal Opinion

Laird v. McPhee

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1928No. Docket No. 3433PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCK, J., pro tem.

This is an action to enforce specific performance of an agreement alleged to have been entered into between plaintiff and defendant, whereby defendant agreed to execute, and plaintiff agreed to accept an oil lease from defendant of certain designated lands owned by defendant.

The trial court made a finding to the effect that defendant never did execute any agreement with plaintiff whereby defendant agreed to lease to plaintiff the designated premises upon the terms and conditions specified in the complaint. Judgment was given for defendant and plaintiff appealed.

The sole…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Curtis Land & Loan Co. v. Interior Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Harper v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Turner v. McCormickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Moss v. AtkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Johnson v. KrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Apablasa v. Merritt & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Ajax Holding Co. v. HeinsbergenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Taylor v. OdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Downer v. BuehrleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Lemberg v. San Francisco Opera AssociationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API