Legal Opinion

Howard v. Jackson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

This suit was commenced by the plaintiff, Margaret Howard, as administratrix of the estate of Garrett H. Griggs, deceased, against the defendants, O. A. and Virgie Mae Jackson, husband and wife, as a suit to quiet title to a parcel of real property in Eiddle.

The defendant Virgie Mae Jackson, by her amended answer, alleged that she and her husband, O. A. Jackson, had entered into a contract to purchase the real property from the decedent, Garrett H. Griggs, and that by a decree of divorce she had acquired her for.mer husband’s interest in said property. 0. A. Jackson did not appear and an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Grider v. TurnbowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Epplett v. Empire Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. City of Reedsport v. HUBBARD ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Farmer v. GrovesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. MacOmber v. WaxbomOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Morrison v. Kandler Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Johnston v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API