Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Martinez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1984No. 14705PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

Sellers, under a real estate contract, brought an action against the buyers to recover title to and possession of the property which is at issue in this case. Following judgment for the vendors, defendant Sennie Martinez appealed, raising three issues: (1) whether delivery of the warranty deed was unconditional and, if so, whether the default provision of the real estate contract was merged into the warranty deed; (2) whether Sennie Martinez received proper notice of vendors’ intent to exercise their option to repossess the real estate; and (3) whether the trial…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Aboud v. AdamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Bishop v. BeecherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. American Civil Liberties Union v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cockrell v. CockrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Credit Institute v. Veterinary Nutrition Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Calderon v. NavaretteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API