Legal Opinion

Rudy v. Bossard

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2000No. 99-120PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Hazel Rudy appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court after a jury returned a verdict in favor of Appellees Sharon Bossard (Sharon) and Lawrence Bos-sard (Lawrence).

We affirm.

ISSUES

Rudy presents the following issues for our consideration:

1. Whether the trial court prejudicially erred by admitting Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 13, the hearsay report of a doctor who did not testify at trial.

2. Whether the trial court prejudicially erred by admitting Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 14, a 113-page pain diary composed by appellee Sharon Bossard.

3. Whether the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Natural Gas Processing Co. v. HullWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Candelaria v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Haderlie v. SondgerothWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Vassos v. RoussalisWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Prager v. Campbell County Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Kimberly Shindell v. Roger ShindellWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Conner v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, NATRONAWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Smyth v. KaufmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Gore v. SherardWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API