Rudy v. Bossard
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Hazel Rudy appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court after a jury returned a verdict in favor of Appellees Sharon Bossard (Sharon) and Lawrence Bos-sard (Lawrence).
We affirm.
ISSUES
Rudy presents the following issues for our consideration:
1. Whether the trial court prejudicially erred by admitting Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 13, the hearsay report of a doctor who did not testify at trial.
2. Whether the trial court prejudicially erred by admitting Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 14, a 113-page pain diary composed by appellee Sharon Bossard.
3. Whether the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Natural Gas Processing Co. v. HullWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Candelaria v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Haderlie v. SondgerothWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Vassos v. RoussalisWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Prager v. Campbell County Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Kimberly Shindell v. Roger ShindellWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Conner v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, NATRONAWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Smyth v. KaufmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Gore v. SherardWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.