Legal Opinion
Gore v. Sherard
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 2002No. 01-136PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, District Judge.
[¶ 1] At the close of appellants' case, the trial court granted the appellees' motion for a directed verdict, more properly referred to as a judgment as a matter of law. W.R.C.P. 50(a). From that order this appeal has been taken.
[¶ 2] We affirm the trial court's decision as herein modified.
ISSUES
[¶ 3] Appellants state the issues as follows:
1. Did the Trial Court err when it directed verdict in favor of the Appellees finding that there were no questions of fact for a jury to decide?
2. Did the Trial Court err when it allowed hearsay testimony from a witness which…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Byerly v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Davenport v. EpperlyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Toltec Watershed Improvement District v. JohnstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- BARON FINANCIAL CORP. v. NatanzonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Fennell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Grove v. PfisterWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Rammell v. Mountainaire Animal Clinic, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.