Legal Opinion

Smyth v. Kaufman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 2003No. 02-38PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[T1] Elizabeth Smyth and her husband, Donald, claimed medical malpractice arising out of an alleged misdiagnosis of the cause of compromised blood flow in Mrs. Smyth's left *1163foot and leg. As a result of the alleged misdiagnosis, Mrs. Smyth's left foot and leg were amputated in three successive medical procedures. -In their suit against the doctors involved, the Smyths alleged it was discovered after the amputations that the drug Caf-ergot caused the decreased blood flow in Mrs. Smyth's left leg and discontinuing the drug would have restored cireulation and prevented the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Edna Goldstein v. Robert E. Kelleher, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. Bradbury v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Jack Belton and John Crochet v. Fibreboard Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Goggins v. HarwoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. TZ Land & Cattle Co. v. CondictWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Brenda Miller, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Connie Rae ScribnerWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Armstrong v. HrabalWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Bangs v. SchrothWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To: LDB, TJB, and JCB, Minor Children, Sheryl Lynn Ellis v. State of Wyoming, Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API