Legal Opinion

Skillings v. Allen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 18, 1919No. 21,361PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Action in tbe district court for Crow Wing county to recover $1,000. Defendant’s demurrer to tbe complaint was overruled, McClenaban, J., and tbe questions presented by the demurrer certified as important and doubtful. From the order overruling the demurrer, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint interposed on tbe ground that no cause of action was stated. The court certified that the question raised was important and doubtful.

In substance the complaint alleged that defendant was a practicing physician, employed by plaintiff and his wife to treat their minor daughter who was ill. The defendant knew that the disease from which the child was suffering was scarlet fever and that it was infectious. Plaintiff’s wife, acting in his and her own behalf, consulted defendant as to the nature of the disease and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Depue v. FlatauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Hewett v. Woman's Hospital Aid Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
  3. Harriott v. PlimptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Edwards v. LambSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bradshaw v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API