Legal Opinion

Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1989No. S003030PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARGUELLES, J.*

Can the mother of a minor child state a claim for the negligent infliction of emotional distress against the psychotherapist who, consulted to treat both mother and son, sexually molested the boy? As, in the circumstances of this case, the therapist’s conduct breached a duty of care owed her as well as her child, we hold she can.

Facts 1

In the summer of 1980, the mothers of minor children Robert F., Phillip G., and Eric R. brought their sons to the Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc., to obtain counseling for family emotional problems. The clinic assigned all three…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. J. C. Penney Casualty Insurance v. M. K.California Supreme Court · 1991

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API