Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. Daniel

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1993PublishedCited by 321 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

We granted this appeal to determine whether a physician has a legal duty to warn a non-patient of the risk of exposure to the source of his patient’s non-contagious disease — Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. The trial court denied the defendant physician’s motion for summary judgment, but granted an interlocutory appeal on the issue of the physician’s legal duty. The Court of Appeals limited the record and held that the facts were insufficient to show that the risk to the non-patient of contracting Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever was such that a legal duty arose on the part…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. McClenahan v. CooleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by321 opinions

  1. Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Staples v. CBL & Associates, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. McCall v. WilderTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. KeithTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Eaton v. McLainTennessee Supreme Court · 1994

316 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API