Legal Opinion
Tracy v. Allstate Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 2, 2002No. AC 21535PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Karen Tracy, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, *727in her action against the defendant for underinsured motorist benefits. The sole issue on appeal is whether the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment because it determined that her action was barred by the contractual limitation provision contained in the automobile insurance policy issued to her by the defendant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following pertinent facts and procedural…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lamberti v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- McGlinchey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Hotkowski v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Coelho v. HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Soares v. George A. Tomasso Construction Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garcia v. ITT Hartford InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Voris v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Tracy v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Tracy v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004