Legal Opinion
Voris v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 2010No. SC 18281PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The plaintiffs, John G. Voris and Joan Voris, appeal 1 from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Middlesex Mutual Assurance Company (Middlesex) and Middle Oak Company (Middle Oak), in the plaintiffs’ action seeking a declaration requiring the defendants to provide the plaintiffs with underinsured motorist benefits. This case presents three issues on appeal, specifically, whether the trial court properly: (1) determined that the plaintiffs’ action was barred by the contractual limitation provision contained in the insurance policy issued…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Hertz Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Amiga Mutual Insurance v. LevineDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Farrell v. Twenty-First Century InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Greater New York Mutual Insurance Co. v. Robbins Eye Center, PCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.