Legal Opinion

Coelho v. Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 2, 1999No. SC 16140PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

This case requires us to determine when the statute of limitations under General Statutes § 52-5761 begins to run on a claim for underinsured motorist benefits. We conclude that the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the claimant has exhausted the limits of liability under the tortfeasor’s policy, and that, in the absence of a contrary provision in the claimant’s motor vehicle policy, an action for underinsured benefits can be brought at any time prior to the expiration of the time limitation of that statute. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Continental Insurance v. Cebe-HaberskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. D'OCCHIO v. Connecticut Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. McGlinchey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Eskin v. CastigliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Oxford Tire Supply, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. King v. SultarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Driscoll v. General Nutrition Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. American States Insurance Company v. Joann LaFlamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API