Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Dietz
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 2009No. G040640PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
INTRODUCTION
Following the entry of the judgment dissolving their marriage, Park E. Dietz and Laura B. Dietz 1 entered into a stipulated judgment in 1999, in which they divided their community property, including their retirement accounts, and agreed Park would pay Laura monthly spousal support. In 2007, Park sought a court order terminating or, alternatively, reducing his spousal support obligation.
After the hearing, the trial court found that a material change of circumstances had occurred since the stipulated judgment because (1) Laura had reached an age at which she could…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Marriage of DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Schmir v. SchmirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- In Re Marriage of BidermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- In RE MARRIAGE OF McCANNCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Rabkin v. RabkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Falcone v. FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Khera v. SameerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Kevin Q. v. Lauren W.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Marriage T.C. v. District Columbia, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Marriage of Baysinger CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.