Legal Opinion
Kevin Q. v. Lauren W.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 13, 2011No. G043576PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IKOLA, J.
The litigation between these parties began some four years ago, in March 2007, when Kevin Q. filed a petition to be declared the father of Lauren W.’s son under the Uniform Parentage Act (UPA) (Fam. Code, § 7600 et seq.).1 The trial court entered a paternity judgment in Kevin’s favor, which we reversed. (Kevin Q. v. Lauren W. (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1119 [95 Cal.Rptr.3d 477].)
In this appeal, Lauren challenges the court’s denial of her motion for a court order requiring Kevin to pay Lauren’s outstanding attorney fees.2 Lauren contends the court’s denial of her fee request was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Marriage of FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Marriage of DietzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morton v. Morton (In re Morton), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- N.S. v. D.M., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Litt v. Eisenhower Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Bendetti v. BendettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Darab N. v. Olivera, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.