Legal Opinion
Khera v. Sameer
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 2012No. H035957PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1471Opinion
ELIA, J.
Madhu S ameer appeals from the denial of her postjudgment motion to modify the judgment’s spousal support order, a hybrid stepdown, Richmond- type order (see In re Marriage of Richmond (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 352 [164 Cal.Rptr. 381]), which provided for the spousal support obligation of her former husband, S ameer Khera, to terminate June 1, 2010, unless she made a good cause showing to extend spousal support.1 Implicit in the parties’ oral stipulation, and the judgment reflecting that agreement, was the expectation that, by June 1, 2010, Madhu would have completed her master’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. SmitheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Marriage of KuppingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist. v. Julian Union Elementary Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. MAG Aerospace Indus., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Edwards v. Heartland Payment Sys., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Samara v. MatarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.