Legal Opinion
In RE MARRIAGE OF McCANN
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 8, 1996No. G013966PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, J.
Kathleen D. McCann (wife) appeals from an order reducing her monthly spousal support from $1,150 to $600. The primary question presented is whether the trial court erred by considering Raymond C. McCann’s (husband) increase in child support payments under the Statewide Uniform Guidelines (former Civ. Code, § 4720 et seq., now Fam. Code, § 4050 et seq.) as a factor supporting the reduction of spousal support.
Statement of Facts
During most of their 16-year marriage, husband served as an officer in the United States Army. His highest annual salary was slightly over $38,000.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of KuppingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- In Re Marriage of CobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- In Re the Marriage of GavronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Khera v. SameerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- In Re Marriage of DietzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Rising v. RisingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Marriage T.C. v. District Columbia, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bayes v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.