Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Duncan
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 11, 2001No. D033482PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Carol C. and William H. Duncan, Jr., were married in February 1989 and separated in September 1994. During their marriage, Carol and William acquired the majority of shares in Duncan-Hurst Capital Management, Inc. (Duncan-Hurst), an investment advisory business managed and operated by William. In a bifurcated proceeding, the court found Duncan-Hurst was community property and applied the exception of Family Code 1 section 2552, subdivision (b) to value the business as of the date of separation. Carol appeals this order, contending the court should have valued Duncan-Hurst…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Weinberg v. WeinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re Marriage of FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Campi v. CampiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- In Re Marriage of DietzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Rosen v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Winternitz v. Winternitz CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Prentis-Margulis v. MargulisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.