Legal Opinion

Bate v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1983No. L.A. 31686PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petitioner Randle Bate was admitted to the practice of law in California in 1969, and has no prior disciplinary record. In October 1980, the State Bar charged petitioner with wilfully misappropriating monies entrusted to him by two separate clients. The State Bar Review Department recommends that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of five years and that execution of suspension be stayed and petitioner placed on probation for five years with actual suspension for the first three years, and other specified conditions.

Petitioner sought review of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Demain v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Garlow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Martin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tarver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Coppock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Chasteen v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Murray v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API