Legal Opinion

Murray v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1985No. S.F. 24901PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

40 Cal.3d 575 (1985)

709 P.2d 480

220 Cal. Rptr. 677

DANIEL P. MURRAY, Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Docket No. S.F. 24901.

Supreme Court of California.

December 9, 1985.

COUNSEL

Daniel P. Murray, in pro. per., for Petitioner.

Herbert M. Rosenthal, Truitt A. Richey, Jr., Richard J. Zanassi and Marilyn Winch for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.[*]

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the State Bar Review Department that petitioner, Daniel Murray, be suspended from the practice of law for two years, that execution of the suspension be stayed, and that petitioner be…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bernstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Jackson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Simmons v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Runsvold v. Idaho State BarIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Edwards v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Young v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API