Legal Opinion

Hall v. Stark Reagan, PC

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 2011No. Docket No. 294647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGleicher, J.

The individual parties to this appeal are present and former shareholders in a law firm, defendant Stark Reagan, EC. Plaintiffs Patrick C. Hall and Ava Ortner filed a complaint against Stark Reagan and the individual defendants, asserting that age discrimination motivated defendants’ decision to terminate Hall’s and Ortner’s shareholder status. The circuit court granted defendants summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) and ordered the case to proceed to arbitration. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

*91I. UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 2003, Stark Reagan hired Hall and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. McIntosh v. GroomesMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Altobelli v. HartmannMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Altobelli v. HartmannMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Patrick C Hall v. Stark Reagan PcMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API