Legal Opinion

Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1974No. 2; Docket 54,526PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This case forcefully demonstrates the costly consequences of formally contracting to buy and sell realty without describing it precisely in metes and bounds. The written contract of the parties refers to the realty conveyed merely as:

"[Property owned by Seller on 28th Street, Grand Rapids, Michigan, approximately across from Berger, Chevrolet * * * .”

As the facts of this case illustrate, such a description was sorely deficient.

Two issues are raised for our consideration:

First, did the trial court properly receive parol evidence of the negotiations of the seller and buyer prior to the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. GroomesMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. McCarty C. Mercury Metalcraft Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SokolowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hall v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Brady v. Central Excavators, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Rasheed v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City of Grosse Pointe Park v. Michigan Municipal Liability & Property PoolMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Shay v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API