Legal Opinion

Altobelli v. Hartmann

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 2014No. Docket 313470PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorrello, P.J.

Plaintiff Dean Altobelli filed a multicount complaint against defendants Michael W Hartmann, Michael A. Coakley and others, alleging that defendants wrongfully terminated his property interest in his membership at Miller Canfield Faddock & Stone, FLLC (“Miller Canfield” or “the firm”). On November 7, 2012, the circuit court denied defendants’ motion for summary disposition and motion to compel arbitration, and granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary disposition under MCR 2.116(0(10) on Count II (shareholder oppression), Count III (conversion), and Count V (tortious interference with a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re EGBERT R SMITH TRUSTMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cuddington v. United Health Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Holland v. Trinity Health Care Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Bennett v. Detroit Police ChiefMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Altobelli v. HartmannMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Altobelli v. HartmannMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API