Altobelli v. Hartmann
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.
This case requires the Court to address whether plaintiffs tort claims against individual principals of a law firm fall within the scope of an arbitration clause that mandates arbitration for any dispute between the firm and a former principal. Generally speaking, a company may only act through its agents. In this case, plaintiff, a former principal, challenges actions the individual defendants performed in their capacities as agents carrying out the business of the firm. Therefore, this is a dispute between the firm and a former principal that falls within the scope of the arbitration clause…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Miller-Davis Co. v. Ahrens Construction, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Kaleva-Norman-Dickson School District No. 6 v. Kalevanorman-Dickson School Teachers' Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Adams v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Trowell v. Providence Hosp. & Med. Ctrs., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2017
- Marjorie Lebenbom v. Ubs Financial Services IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- 2727 Russell Street LLC v. Bert W Dearing JrMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Akins Construction, Inc. v. North American Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Amy Solek, Personal Representative of the Estate of Emily Victoria Solek v. K&B Transportation, Inc., an Iowa CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.