Legal Opinion

Altobelli v. Hartmann

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2016No. Docket 150656PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.

This case requires the Court to address whether plaintiffs tort claims against individual principals of a law firm fall within the scope of an arbitration clause that mandates arbitration for any dispute between the firm and a former principal. Generally speaking, a company may only act through its agents. In this case, plaintiff, a former principal, challenges actions the individual defendants performed in their capacities as agents carrying out the business of the firm. Therefore, this is a dispute between the firm and a former principal that falls within the scope of the arbitration clause…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Miller-Davis Co. v. Ahrens Construction, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Kaleva-Norman-Dickson School District No. 6 v. Kalevanorman-Dickson School Teachers' Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Adams v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Trowell v. Providence Hosp. & Med. Ctrs., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Marjorie Lebenbom v. Ubs Financial Services IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. 2727 Russell Street LLC v. Bert W Dearing JrMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Akins Construction, Inc. v. North American Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  5. Amy Solek, Personal Representative of the Estate of Emily Victoria Solek v. K&B Transportation, Inc., an Iowa CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API