Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Groomes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1924No. Docket No. 74PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

By written agreement, plaintiff transferred to defendant the exclusive right to manufacture and sell certain valves under a patent of which she was the owner. The contract contained the following provisions:

“It is further mutually understood and agreed that the said Harry M. Groomes, party of the second part, is to pay to the said party of the first part, from the sale of said valves, the sum of one thousand dollars per annum, payable at the rate of ten cents for each and every valve sold, said payments of said royalties to be paid to the said Grace McIntosh during her natural life unless the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Michigan Crown Fender Co. v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Switzer v. Pinconning Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Farnsworth v. FraserMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. City of Grosse Pointe Park v. Michigan Municipal Liability & Property PoolMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Valentine v. General American Credit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Shay v. AldrichMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API