Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Angst

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 12, 2002No. 25, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

Respondent, Gregory Scott Angst (“Angst”), was admitted to the Bar on December 17,1991. On September 25, 2001, the Attorney Grievance Commission, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709(a), filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent, charging numerous violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”), including MRPC 1.2 (Scope of representation), 1 MRPC 1.3 (Diligence), 2 MRPC 1.4 (Communication), 3 MRPC 1.15 (Safekeeping property), 4 MRPC 8.1 (Bar admission and disciplinary matters), 5 and MRPC 8.4(a)(b)(c) & (d) (Misconduct). 6 The charges…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SweitzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API