Legal Opinion
Green v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 20, 2011No. Civil Action No. 11-2067 (SDW)(MCA)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIGENTON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., and Keurig, Inc.’s, (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Philip Green’s (“Plaintiff’ or *278“Green”) individual claims and class action allegations pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (“Motions”). This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391. These Motions are decided without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons stated below, this…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Francis E. Parker Memorial Home, Inc. v. Georgia-Pacific LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Golden v. Den-Mat Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- In re Riddell Concussion Reduction LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.